Be sure to check out the new episode of LIBH, it goes live at 11AM ET!

In a meeting recently, Amy Klobuchar was sharing a personal story of her relative being killed by a shooter. After sharing this and other related things, she then asked Kash Patel "should we limit assault rifles? what do you think?" One of the tactics of those who promote gun restriction is to make their narrative personal and create a leadup, to pull on the hearts of the listeners and "bend" them in their direction. This is not new, but how this question is answered is very important. It is a trap, designed to make it easy for the person answering to either compromise their convictions or seem cold and unsympathetic, and their answer is used against them to the public. It is especially important for the FBI director and other leading officials to answer these questions in a way which balances true sympathy and respect, with the reality that the right to keep and bear arms 'shall not be infringed'. This balance does not have to be a mental tightrope. An example of such an answer is:

...

The candidate for the New Jersey governors race, Jack Ciatarelli, is the same man who ran four years ago. He appeared to be tied with the present governor, if not ahead. However, on election day, true to 2020 form, the election was not called until ten days later - enough time to "find" 10,000 more ballots - in favor of his opponent. The democrat machine will attempt to do this again, and in light of this, combined with the people leaving the democrat party since, the election result is not to be believed should there be any result other than a clear win for Jack Ciatarelli.

www.donaldjtrump.com