The DOJ has released 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, and has withheld or redacted 200,000 pages for normal legal purposes that transpire daily, including victim privacy.

President Trump said clearly that he wanted to release the files and promised many times to do so - virtually in their entirety - both before and after coming into office. This is not the position that someone takes when they themselves are culpable in the scheme.
He also said not to believe the hoax - the narrative that some were attempting to form about his being culpable.
Thus the other, more casual things he said of the same nature, such as "not worrying" or "not thinking" about them, are all related to this.
He didn't suddenly come up with some new, third position about the files in the course of speaking about them publicly, nor did he change his mind about releasing them.

The fact that the DOJ has not name dropped is in keeping with justice, not at odds with it, because equal treatment under the law, by definition, forbids name dropping.

The reason that it took the DOJ as long as it did to release the files is the simple fact that files of this type and magnitude take time. The fact that it took time and that they haven't yet released the list of perpetrators does not indicate a cover up for President Trump nearly as much as it indicates so many other officials involved that it would upend nearly the entire functioning of government, both here and around the world, if this information was to be released and acted upon all at once.
This may seem like an appealing idea, but the implications of this are larger than we can imagine, and with something of this magnitude, there sometimes has to be a fine balancing act between the execution of justice and maintaining some semblance of an organized, civil society.
This was the problem with the French Revolution compared to the American Revolution.
With the French, this balance was not possible due to the French's character. With the absence of the former government, there was terror and mob rule, which left France in ruins.
How would people, both across the world and in the United States, respond today if large parts of civil government were suddenly taken down? This is a legitimate question with tremendous implications for law-enforcement.

As for President Trump, what many may still not know due to the active suppression of knowledge by the news media is that years before Jeffrey Epstein was convicted, he tried to lure two of Trump's female employees away from Mar-a-logo, to get them to work for him instead.

In response, Trump banned him from Mar-a-logo and banned him from even setting foot on the premises, calling him a sleazebag. Years later, when he found out about Epstein's involvement in the possible trafficking of under age girls, he volunteered to be, and became, an informant for the FBI in monitoring his whereabouts and activity.

In addition, Trump is one of the most well-known, widely reported on people in the world. There has always been intrigue, drama and news organizations covering every aspect of his life and work since the 1980's. He has been audited every year since the 1980's. If he had somehow been involved in Epstein's activity, it would have been front page, headline news across the world, with his enemies more than eager to share all the evidence.
Yet even his most virulent haters in the Whitehouse prior to his return had four years to gather, study and release the Epstein files - in their entirety, and unredacted, and they did nothing.
They didn't do anything with them because they knew he wasn't guilty, and the only true interest they have in the Epstein files is not justice for the victims, but an opportunity to use these files as a weapon against an innocent man whom they hate. When they find that they cannot use it as a weapon in the light of truth, they set it aside, and ignore both the true perpetrators and their victims. This is not justice. This is not American behavior, nor is it in keeping with the U.S Constitution, which they also hate. It is Stalinist behavior, and if at this point in time a person really still suspects that President Trump was involved in the Epstein case, they have been listening to the wrong people for far too long. This is what President Trump meant when he said "It is time to move on" from the Epstein files. He meant that it is time to move on from the hoaxes, the false accusations and evil surmisings against the innocent that have plagued the country for more than ten years. He did not mean that we should move on from seeking real justice.
Regarding this justice, it might be of keen interest for the public to know that Jeffrey Epstein donated exclusively to democrat campaigns, and supported exclusively democrat politicians, not Republicans and certainly not to MAGA. So it will be very interesting indeed to see who is on "the list".