A "phobia", by definition, is an irrational fear; It is one that has no basis in reality, such as a fear of heights when you are in no position to fall; Fear at the sight of a spider or snake, when they are not anywhere near or pose no threat; Fear of normal germs/bacteria, where there is a compulsion to wash your hands constantly or keep the house 'perfect'. In contrast, the objection to a destructive religious or social construct is not irrational. The charge that it is, is dependent on a complete denial that any of the concerns about it have standing. It necessitates that the very people making the charge are, themselves, either completely ignorant of the subject on which they're speaking, or they are intentionally trying to deceive. The absurdity of this charge can be seen more clearly by looking at the people making it. On the day that Israel was attacked, they denied any wrongdoing on the part of Hamas, or the people and entities behind Hamas, and instead faulted Israel as being an "occupier" and a "genocidal" nation. This was quickly accompanied in the days following by burning and spray-painted Swastikas, world-wide calls to "gas the Jews" or "kill the Jews", and the statement that "Hitler was right". Thus the charge of "Islamophobia" comes from those who oppose Israel, invert reality and side with an Islamic terrorist group. Needless to say, such people are not a reliable reference for determining the rationality of our fears.
People do not form these opinions or views if they have "learned" nothing about the subject beforehand.
This is a result of many years of neglect on the part of parents and the federal government regarding what is taught in the university system, combined with both the willful ignorance and "tolerance" of Islam in general. The attacks didn't create the narrative. They exposed the narrative, and in that moment, when the programming is challenged, a person is faced with a choice: You can either look into the matter further and be open to changing your mind, or you must deny the entire reality of the situation, turn the truth upside down, and expect everyone else to follow suit. When you choose the latter, you are no longer a trustworthy member of society. When you either deny the reality of the attacks, or you attempt to justify them by making Israel out to be the true villain, you are akin to those who deny the Holocaust or actively take the side of the Nazi's, for the nature of the attack is the same. When you do this, you do not believe in "peaceful coexistence"; You are looking for revolution, and you are attempting to call people names in order to avoid even having to fight for it.
www.donaldjtrump.com
Interact with other like-minded supporters of the RSBN Community and know the others in the chat are supporting Right Side Broadcasting just like you! Encourage others to join the chat and have fun!
Note: Chat is moderated to prevent NSFW content. Keep it civil, clean and respectful!
Those who do not want to make a persons religion an important factor in a campaign or administration must, in order to be consistent, reject a figure whose religious emphasis as a Muslim comes first, second and last.
The record speaks for itself that while people may have equal rights, they do not have equal religions:
1993 – World Trade Center Bomber was not Zionist • Truck bomb detonated in the underground parking garage.
1998 – U.S. Embassy Bombings we’re not Zionists • Al-Qaeda bombed American embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam.
2000 – USS Cole Bombers we’re not Zionists • Suicide attackers struck a U.S. Navy destroyer.
2001 – September 11 Attacks were not Zionists • Coordinated airplane hijackings targeting the Twin Towers, Pentagon, and a failed attempt that crashed in Pennsylvania.
2002 – Bali Bombings were not Zionist • Jemaah Islamiyah bombings targeting nightclubs.
2004 – Madrid Train Bombings (Spain) • Al-Qaeda-inspired attackers bombed commuter ...
There are concrete reasons why housing is often unaffordable now, as opposed to being more affordable in the past. A part of the problem is the spending / inflation. Another cause is not the lack of homes. It is in fact the overabundance of homes in the wrong places. This raises the property values and home prices in these areas, thus making more areas of the country less affordable. It has been said that much of the baby boomer generation made lifestyle decisions with no regard as to long-term consequences for the future. There was often no consideration as to whether their activities served to establish respect, a positive legacy or whether it served to keep / preserve existing wealth and quality. This includes not only many of the purchasers / renters, but also many city planners, when they divide land into as many small lots as possible, or developers and some county commissioners, when an effort is made to rezone land that was not even intended for housing, with the bribes of developer ...
