When a person comes to the country and runs for office whose religion is not native to the fabric of the United States, the people have not only the right, but the responsibility to question it. An immigrant of good faith understands this and expects to be scrutinized heavily. They approach the country and its people with respect and humility, because they embrace the reality that to be able to immigrate to the United States is not a right. It is a privilege, and they have no right to be any other way. When such a person bristles instead, does not renounce all other contradictory allegiances and tenets, and slurs those who object to his citizenship, that person is already showing that he is at odds with the host country, and is not fit to be a citizen.
The people such as Zohran Mamdani who come from elsewhere in the world come from a caste system, which means that where you were born on the social / economic ladder is where you will stay. Upward mobility is non-existent, and there is often perpetual resentment and striving against the "rich", the "leaders" and the "noble class", yet with no hope of ever reaching their likes. Though such people may seek a new country, and though they may claim to seek "a new and better life", they carry the old mentality, and this mentality has been branded into them from the time they were born. Because of this, their perspective on the "rich" and "powerful" in the United States is fundamentally flawed, and it is on full display in virtually every speech that the Zohran Mamdanis of the world give. They have no first-hand, experiential knowledge of the country and its character, and no personal knowledge of its greatest men, who either built it in the past, or who help sustain it in the present. Without the men they rail against, there would be none of the "middle" or "working class" that they claim so much to champion. Further, despite their many favorable words regarding the "working class", it is scarce to find even three clear instances where middle class wages, cost of living or the purchasing power of the dollar improved as a direct result of their policies. Never have their policies made it easier for the working class to succeed who have, or want to have their own small enterprise, and no examples exist of them voluntarily reversing their policies in either situation when their policies are making things worse.
You may know the material on a written citizenship test; That doesn't mean you know anything about the country for which the test is taken. The fact that you dislike the cast system doesn't mean you understand or appreciate capitalism. It is not bigotry or anti-immigrant to state this reality, nor is it wrong to approach immigration with a strong filter as a result of this reality.
The term "Islamophobia" is simply a variant of the "bigotry" or "anti-immigrant" accusation, and it was coined by none other than the Muslim Brotherhood, as a way to castigate and silence anyone who might dare question their ideology. The idea is to be able to infiltrate and subvert a country from within with the least amount of resistance possible. The Scriptures refer to the tongue as being like the rudder of a ship - that how the tongue is used determines the direction of the entire person. Consequently, whoever/whatever controls the tongue ultimately controls the entire person. The Muslim religion and its practitioners know this. Thus they know that when they can control the way you speak or silence you altogether, they can control the whole person. When they control enough people, they can eventually take control of a neighborhood, city or nation without ever firing a shot. When they look around and see the "tolerance" and passivity, the purposeful turning of a blind eye, the silence and inaction on the part of both community and government alike, they must feel pretty confident that their mission will succeed, for their key slogan in connection with it is: "You have the clocks; We have the time."
When a person or society allows themselves to be controlled by their preemptive narratives and accusations, that person by definition is mentally ill, and their entire state of existence is compromised. When a person says, "Not every Muslim is bad or radical", that person is only easing themselves from the true measures that need to be taken. The reason why there has been little action on the part of elected officials and law-enforcement regarding the Muslim threat is because of the tacit acknowledgement that to deport one Muslim means to deport all. To bar one from holding an office in US government means to bar them all. This also means that eliminating the terrorists from a given country, so as to never have Islamic terrorism again, means eliminating the group to which they belong, who in ways big and small, support and cheer their efforts. Two years have now elapsed since the Oct. 7th massacre. Twenty four years have passed since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Terrorists have been eliminated, plots have been thwarted, peace treaties have been signed. "Innocent", "peaceful" Muslims have been given assurance, allowed to live wherever they choose, and in some cases actively welcomed into non-Muslim countries. Yet the terrorist / subversion threat is as prevalent today as it was on 9/11. This is because the religion that spurs the active terrorists runs through the entire group, making the entire group bad.

www.donaldjtrump.com