Yesterday, Greg Kelly raised three interesting reasons for why he is hesitant to support Curtis Sliwa. These are the objections mentioned, with the answers following them underneath.
Objection 1: It is easier or more likely to hold Andrew Cuomo accountable for his corruption if he is in a prominent office, than if he were to retire to the private sector.
Answer: It is not best to try and hold a person accountable for corruption and scandal while he is in the middle of trying to lead in another important position. This is unwieldy, and serves to cripple a present administration. It is far better simply to have another person in that position who does not have any such baggage, working free and clear, with a good plan for the office he holds. In this case, there would be no need for any ongoing investigations and prosecutions while he is trying to lead.
In addition, it is better for the city or country to prosecute a crooked figure by calling him up as a civilian, rather than when he is engaged in further public work, where there would be further opportunity for their corruption to continue.
Objection 2: Curtis Sliwa does not talk about Mamdani on the campaign trail as much as Cuomo. He talks more about radio stations and Andrew Cuomo than the main adversary.
Answer: Curtis has mentioned Andrew Cuomo often because of his absurd combination: His past, his loss in the primary, yet his continuing to run as an independent, while calling for one of the two major candidates to drop out rather than him.
He has had to address this because it is the major elephant in the room, the major obstacle to Curtis being able to beat Mamdani.
This emphasis should not be taken as a lack of understanding or concern about Mamdani, or as a lack of vision and integrity regarding his work as Mayor. On the contrary, he has laid out clear plans and goals on every crucial area of the mayorship, more than either Cuomo or Mamdani by far. Although his T.V ads are more generic, his specific, in-depth ideas are readily heard in his meetings with the voters, in the debate, in his solo long form interviews and elsewhere.
Objection 3: He ran before and lost to Eric Adams. What has Curtis Sliwa done differently this time from when he lost in 2021 to Adams?
Answer: Before coming to any judgement about Sliwa's likelyhood to win based on his previous race, it should be remembered that almost none of the other leaders who we know and admire today won their first political race. Yet they ran again, with their message continuing to spread, gaining more recognition and respect with the public. At the same time, the public now knows a lot more about Eric Adams, Andrew Cuomo and the entire democrst machine than they did before. The more that these fall into disrepute, the more Sliwa's recognition grows. Further, as those who initially supported Mamdani turn away from him, they are not going to want to revert back to Cuomo or anyone like him. Because of all these things, the man who beat Curtis four years ago didn't even run for a second term now, and Curtis is more recognized today than ever before as the man the city really needs. He has been conducting a more high-profile campaign, going into every area of the five burrows in NYC and working 20 out of the 24 hours in a day doing so.
It is a very unusual moment when both the left and the right agree that the democrat establishment, typified in Andrew Cuomo, is not acceptable. I would like to encourage Greg Kelly: Let's take advantage of this moment, and lead both sides through example into a better path.
www.donaldjtrump.com
Interact with other like-minded supporters of the RSBN Community and know the others in the chat are supporting Right Side Broadcasting just like you! Encourage others to join the chat and have fun!
Note: Chat is moderated to prevent NSFW content. Keep it civil, clean and respectful!
To the voters: Do not let the polls favoring Andrew Cuomo or Zohran Mamdani manipulate you into voting for someone you hate. Curtis Sliwa is a man of integrity who has a good plan. He has chosen to stay in the race because doing so means that you have the choice to vote for the best, not simply the one who seems "more popular". Choose rightly, and Curtis Sliwa will win, no matter what the polls say. Every single person has the opportunity - and responsibility - to help put him over the finish line. Even if Cuomo or Mamdani were to win anyway, you would at least be able to sleep at night knowing that you did what was right. This also means that if you decide to vote for Cuomo instead, and Mamdani ends up winning, you only have yourself to blame, not Curtis Sliwa.
Further: If you vote for Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo or don't vote at all, it means that you liked one of these options well enough to choose them; This means you like them well enough to live with them. You are not welcome to move to ...
Siraj Wahaj is a long time Imam of the Masid At-Taqwa in Brooklyn, NY. This man served as a character witness in the trial of Omar Abdel-Rahman, a convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and has a long history of calling for the exploitation of American democracy to further the conquest of Islam.
It has been found that Mamdani both knows Siraj Wahaj and has lauded him as "one of the nation’s foremost Muslim leaders and a pillar of the Bed-Stuy community." A video-taped sermon from 1991 shows him saying, "You don't get in politics because it's the American thing to do. You get involved in politics because politics can be a weapon to use in the cause of Islam."
This Imam is not alone, not a one-off extremist or an exception to normal Muslim doctrine. Instead, he is one of the truest faces of Islam in this time.
The following article gives a further view of the web of Muslim figures, organizations and clergy which have all conspired against the United States, and ...
