The left, because of their claim of being "progressive", refuses to accept even their own previous spending patterns and policies in a Congressional bill. Instead, it is ever "onward and upward". The extent of this extreme is being seen now: If other members of Congress do not accept their very latest 'advancement', then they would rather shut the government down then to even accept their very own bills or CR's that they advanced up until now. This extremism makes it unmistakably clear that the way to approach federal bills from this time forward is not by simply attempting to forward previous iterations, since the left won't even accept that. Instead, it is time to lay the ax to the entire tree, and cut out everything that they have forwarded until now and present a completely fresh bill, which among other things, represents all the drastic spending cuts needed to spend less than what the government takes in. This is what true leadership looks like in the face of an opponent that leaves you no room for any other option. In this situation, they have left no room for compromise, no room for a "deal".
Going in the complete opposite direction of what they want to do will be not only best for the country, but will be a strong discouragement/disciplinary measure to the left against ever trying it again.
They may yell and scream, run around with their hair on fire and attempt further violence. The American people and the Congress are not to be afraid of their reactions or manipulated into compromising. This entire scheme is sick. It is toxic, and breaking away from it completely is not only healthy; It is necessary! Instead, recognize that this is simply the behavior of people who have never known principles or right and wrong, and who think that neither they nor their government needs to live by them. Their shutting down of the government, for however long it lasts, is simply another version of this stubborn childishness. It, like so many other things, only shows what a dose of reality they really need.
www.donaldjtrump.com
Interact with other like-minded supporters of the RSBN Community and know the others in the chat are supporting Right Side Broadcasting just like you! Encourage others to join the chat and have fun!
Note: Chat is moderated to prevent NSFW content. Keep it civil, clean and respectful!
In a meeting recently, Amy Klobuchar was sharing a personal story of her relative being killed by a shooter. After sharing this and other related things, she then asked Kash Patel "should we limit assault rifles? what do you think?" One of the tactics of those who promote gun restriction is to make their narrative personal and create a leadup, to pull on the hearts of the listeners and "bend" them in their direction. This is not new, but how this question is answered is very important. It is a trap, designed to make it easy for the person answering to either compromise their convictions or seem cold and unsympathetic, and their answer is used against them to the public. It is possible to answer these questions in a way which balances true sympathy and respect, with the reality that the right to keep and bear arms 'shall not be infringed'. This balance does not have to be a mental tightrope. An example of such an answer is:
"[Person's Title], I am very sorry for your loss, and have ...
The candidate for the New Jersey governors race, Jack Ciatarelli, is the same man who ran four years ago. He appeared to be tied with the present governor, if not ahead. However, on election day, true to 2020 form, the election was not called until ten days later - enough time to "find" 10,000 more ballots - in favor of his opponent. The democrat machine will attempt to do this again, and in light of this, combined with the people leaving the democrat party since, the election result is not to be believed should there be any result other than a clear win for Jack Ciatarelli.
www.donaldjtrump.com
